US B-2s Just COLLAPSED Iran’s Largest Tunnels… 5,000 Elite IRGC Troops STRANDED

For years, Iran invested vast resources into building underground missile complexes and fortified nuclear facilities carved deep into mountains. These hidden networks — often described as “missile cities” — were designed to survive even the most advanced military strikes. Reinforced with layers of rock, concrete, and sophisticated tunnel systems, they were widely viewed as among the most secure military installations in the region.

But the reported 72-hour campaign known as Operation Epic Fury has challenged that assumption. According to defense assessments circulating among analysts, U.S. heavy strategic bombers — including B-2, B-1, and B-52 aircraft — conducted a series of precision strikes targeting key underground infrastructure. The operation reportedly relied on specialized munitions such as the 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and precision-guided JDAM weapons designed to reach hardened targets deep below the surface.

The strikes focused on vulnerable access points — tunnel entrances, ventilation shafts, and support infrastructure — rather than simply targeting surface structures. By disabling these critical systems, the operation aimed to seal underground complexes and disrupt their operational capability. Facilities frequently cited in reports included major sites near Fordow and Isfahan, long associated with sensitive military and nuclear activity.

Military analysts say this approach reflects an evolving strategy in modern warfare: targeting functionality instead of just physical destruction. By rendering underground networks inaccessible or unsafe, airpower can neutralize hardened installations that were once considered nearly invulnerable.

Some preliminary estimates from defense commentators suggest the strikes may have significantly degraded portions of Iran’s missile and drone capabilities, though precise figures remain difficult to confirm. Claims that 80% to 90% of stockpiles were destroyed have circulated widely, but such numbers remain subject to verification and ongoing intelligence assessments.

If the reported damage is substantial, the ripple effects could extend beyond Iran itself. Tehran has long supported allied groups across the region, including forces in Lebanon and Yemen. A major reduction in missile supply chains or logistical infrastructure could complicate operations for these partners and alter regional military dynamics.

At the same time, analysts caution against assuming permanent strategic change. History has shown that military infrastructure can be rebuilt, adapted, or relocated. Underground facilities, in particular, often evolve in response to new threats, becoming deeper, more dispersed, or more concealed.

Operation Epic Fury — if confirmed at the scale described — would mark a significant demonstration of long-range precision strike capability and advanced bunker-penetrating technology. It would also underscore how modern airpower continues to reshape assumptions about fortified defenses.

Yet the broader consequences remain uncertain. Iran’s next steps, regional responses, and diplomatic developments will ultimately determine whether the strikes represent a temporary disruption or a lasting shift in the Middle East’s balance of power.

For now, one reality stands out: the strategic landscape appears to be changing, and the long-term effects of this reported campaign may unfold for years to come.